Again and again you can see players that go with the last 15 to 20% from the outset of their rather small stacks all in and buy more after the loss of all the chips now on until a stack of perhaps ins 20 to 25% of Maximum buy-out.
An example: At one table de tournoi de poker, the maximum buy-in, say, $ 10 The player buys into the game for $ 2 After some time his stack down to 40cent. Then the player goes with his last chips all-in. As a rule, he loses that hand. Because he wants to continue but at this table (and often also in some other), he buys the same back into the tournoi de poker en ligne game. In general, for the same money: $ 2
Much better it would have been if he had later purchased before the All-In chips. First, he would have had then a higher stack, which always makes an impression, and secondly, he would not have his last chips worth of medium-50cent on two starting cards must share in the hope that they keep and bring him victory.
One lap later, then call out the two chip leaders to a duel, and sometimes one wonders if the winner has been determined why. As a moderate Stak at the table, one is often forced into this situation to fold his cards, because it seems obvious that since AA meets KK. And then one is surprised when one turns on the showdown players middle suited connectors that are miraculously become a straight and pocketing the entire pot because the enemy has withstood ten couples any more than the stack, which is now down to zero. Fold is a good move if you want to stay out of trouble in the game of tournois de poker.